. * * window.aa needs to exist and be usable by ANY module's script, * however early it runs - main-nav's script, for one, runs near * the top of

91ﾌｽｻｨ

, well before the real search-insights.js * so the download * begins as early as before. Repeat calls share the same downloads, a * failed load is retried on the next call, and the versions / SRI * hashes live only here. * * Algolia Insights is unaffected: window.aa above is still created in * on every page and queues events until search-insights loads. * * window.loadAlgoliaLibs({ priority: 'high' }) (Oct 2026): used by the * /search page, where the first results wait on these libraries. Chrome * gives async scripts low priority, behind images and fonts; this asks * for high instead (fetchpriority). Only the first call for a library * sets its priority - later calls share that download. */ (function (win, doc) { var LIBS = [ { ready: function () { return !!win['algoliasearch/lite']; }, src: 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/algoliasearch@5.52.1/dist/lite/builds/browser.umd.js', integrity: 'sha256-I2oYUIvhx1g6l4lTP+yoERbzLIHKzw4AKaBRQPwIeDY=' }, { ready: function () { return !!win.instantsearch; }, src: 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/instantsearch.js@4.98.0/dist/instantsearch.production.min.js', integrity: 'sha256-ngmqZk4WBxUw257aMYZayyNBd983INngagv0jI6Ecfs=' } ]; function loadOne(lib, options) { if (lib.ready()) return Promise.resolve(); // One download per library, shared by every caller; reset on // failure so the next call retries just the library that failed. if (lib.pending) return lib.pending; lib.pending = new Promise(function (resolve, reject) { var script = doc.createElement('script'); script.src = lib.src; script.integrity = lib.integrity; script.crossOrigin = 'anonymous'; script.async = true; if (options && options.priority === 'high') script.setAttribute('fetchpriority', 'high'); script.onload = function () { lib.ready() ? resolve() : reject(new Error('Loaded but not available: ' + lib.src)); }; script.onerror = function () { script.remove(); reject(new Error('Could not load ' + lib.src)); }; doc.head.appendChild(script); }); lib.pending.catch(function () { lib.pending = null; }); return lib.pending; } win.loadAlgoliaLibs = function (options) { return Promise.all(LIBS.map(function (lib) { return loadOne(lib, options); })); }; })(window, document); . */ window.hsConversationsSettings = window.hsConversationsSettings || {}; window.hsConversationsSettings.loadImmediately = false; (function (win) { var EVENTS = ['pointerdown', 'keydown', 'touchstart', 'scroll', 'mousemove', 'wheel']; var done = false; /* 19 Oct 2026 - chat widget layout shift (field CLS). Phones fail Core Web Vitals on CLS (p75 ~0.2 site-wide in CrUX for months). Biggest cause found: HubSpot's chat container is fixed to the bottom-right corner and changes size - 100x96 launcher to 282x253 when the welcome message pops up (~5 s after load), and to full screen when a visitor opens the chat. Its top-left corner moves, so Chrome scores it as a layout shift: 0.088 per page view at 360x640 (0.044 at 412x850), on every page. Taps happen inside the chat iframe, so the parent page never sees the input and the open/close shifts count too. Fix: whenever the container's size changes it is made transparent for 400 ms (Chrome doesn't score shifts of invisible elements), then shown again at its new size. Tested on live io1001 at 360x640 in a cookie-less frame: the 0.088 shift no longer appears. The chat itself is unchanged - it just appears 0.4 s later at each resize. Relies on HubSpot's container id; if that changes this does nothing (no error). */ function cloakChatResizes() { var ID = 'hubspot-messages-iframe-container'; function watch(c) { if (c.getAttribute('data-bb-cloak')) return; c.setAttribute('data-bb-cloak', '1'); var last = c.offsetWidth + 'x' + c.offsetHeight, timer = null; new MutationObserver(function () { var size = c.offsetWidth + 'x' + c.offsetHeight; if (size === last) return; last = size; c.style.setProperty('opacity', '0', 'important'); clearTimeout(timer); timer = setTimeout(function () { c.style.removeProperty('opacity'); }, 400); }).observe(c, { attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'], subtree: true, childList: true }); } var found = document.getElementById(ID); if (found) { watch(found); return; } if (!document.body || !('MutationObserver' in win)) return; var mo = new MutationObserver(function () { var c = document.getElementById(ID); if (c) { mo.disconnect(); watch(c); } }); mo.observe(document.body, { childList: true }); setTimeout(function () { mo.disconnect(); }, 30000); } function loadWidget() { var api = win.HubSpotConversations; if (api && api.widget && api.widget.status && api.widget.status().loaded) return; try { cloakChatResizes(); } catch (e) {} if (api && api.widget) api.widget.load(); } function onFirstInteraction() { if (done) return; done = true; EVENTS.forEach(function (type) { win.removeEventListener(type, onFirstInteraction, { passive: true }); }); var start = function () { if (win.HubSpotConversations) loadWidget(); else (win.hsConversationsOnReady = win.hsConversationsOnReady || []).push(loadWidget); }; if ('requestIdleCallback' in win) win.requestIdleCallback(start, { timeout: 1500 }); else setTimeout(start, 200); } EVENTS.forEach(function (type) { win.addEventListener(type, onFirstInteraction, { passive: true }); }); })(window);

91ﾌｽｻｨ

01.09.2022 | Published by The Genetics Podcast

Founder/former CEO Dr Mark Kotter speaking on The Genetics Podcast

91ﾌｽｻｨ Founder and former CEO Dr Mark Kotter was a speaker on The Genetics Podcast with Dr Patrick Short. On the podcast, they discuss scientific breakthroughs in the field of reprogramming biology, and cover how 91ﾌｽｻｨ's opti-ox technology enables the precise reprogramming of entire cultures of stem cells into any cell type on a vast scale.

They address how today's cell therapies show huge promise in treating blood cancers, but are entirely bespoke when it comes to manufacturing, and are therefore very expensive. Even when cells are successfully produced, in many cases scalability remains a major hurdle to be overcome. They also touch on the differences in approaches like autologous therapy - where a patient's own cells are used - or an allogeneic therapy - where donor cells are used, and how the supply of cells for these therapies is finite and variable in quality and properties.

窶弩hat we wanted to do is we wanted to be in a position where the company can create any cell type from scratch.窶�

Mark KotterCo-founder and former CEO, 91ﾌｽｻｨ

Related pages

About us Coding cells to advance the wellbeing of humanity

Careers See the latest openings

Blog See the latest blogs