. * * window.aa needs to exist and be usable by ANY module's script, * however early it runs - main-nav's script, for one, runs near * the top of

91探花

, well before the real search-insights.js * so the download * begins as early as before. Repeat calls share the same downloads, a * failed load is retried on the next call, and the versions / SRI * hashes live only here. * * Algolia Insights is unaffected: window.aa above is still created in * on every page and queues events until search-insights loads. * * window.loadAlgoliaLibs({ priority: 'high' }) (Oct 2026): used by the * /search page, where the first results wait on these libraries. Chrome * gives async scripts low priority, behind images and fonts; this asks * for high instead (fetchpriority). Only the first call for a library * sets its priority - later calls share that download. */ (function (win, doc) { var LIBS = [ { ready: function () { return !!win['algoliasearch/lite']; }, src: 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/algoliasearch@5.52.1/dist/lite/builds/browser.umd.js', integrity: 'sha256-I2oYUIvhx1g6l4lTP+yoERbzLIHKzw4AKaBRQPwIeDY=' }, { ready: function () { return !!win.instantsearch; }, src: 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/instantsearch.js@4.98.0/dist/instantsearch.production.min.js', integrity: 'sha256-ngmqZk4WBxUw257aMYZayyNBd983INngagv0jI6Ecfs=' } ]; function loadOne(lib, options) { if (lib.ready()) return Promise.resolve(); // One download per library, shared by every caller; reset on // failure so the next call retries just the library that failed. if (lib.pending) return lib.pending; lib.pending = new Promise(function (resolve, reject) { var script = doc.createElement('script'); script.src = lib.src; script.integrity = lib.integrity; script.crossOrigin = 'anonymous'; script.async = true; if (options && options.priority === 'high') script.setAttribute('fetchpriority', 'high'); script.onload = function () { lib.ready() ? resolve() : reject(new Error('Loaded but not available: ' + lib.src)); }; script.onerror = function () { script.remove(); reject(new Error('Could not load ' + lib.src)); }; doc.head.appendChild(script); }); lib.pending.catch(function () { lib.pending = null; }); return lib.pending; } win.loadAlgoliaLibs = function (options) { return Promise.all(LIBS.map(function (lib) { return loadOne(lib, options); })); }; })(window, document); . */ window.hsConversationsSettings = window.hsConversationsSettings || {}; window.hsConversationsSettings.loadImmediately = false; (function (win) { var EVENTS = ['pointerdown', 'keydown', 'touchstart', 'scroll', 'mousemove', 'wheel']; var done = false; /* 19 Oct 2026 - chat widget layout shift (field CLS). Phones fail Core Web Vitals on CLS (p75 ~0.2 site-wide in CrUX for months). Biggest cause found: HubSpot's chat container is fixed to the bottom-right corner and changes size - 100x96 launcher to 282x253 when the welcome message pops up (~5 s after load), and to full screen when a visitor opens the chat. Its top-left corner moves, so Chrome scores it as a layout shift: 0.088 per page view at 360x640 (0.044 at 412x850), on every page. Taps happen inside the chat iframe, so the parent page never sees the input and the open/close shifts count too. Fix: whenever the container's size changes it is made transparent for 400 ms (Chrome doesn't score shifts of invisible elements), then shown again at its new size. Tested on live io1001 at 360x640 in a cookie-less frame: the 0.088 shift no longer appears. The chat itself is unchanged - it just appears 0.4 s later at each resize. Relies on HubSpot's container id; if that changes this does nothing (no error). */ function cloakChatResizes() { var ID = 'hubspot-messages-iframe-container'; function watch(c) { if (c.getAttribute('data-bb-cloak')) return; c.setAttribute('data-bb-cloak', '1'); var last = c.offsetWidth + 'x' + c.offsetHeight, timer = null; new MutationObserver(function () { var size = c.offsetWidth + 'x' + c.offsetHeight; if (size === last) return; last = size; c.style.setProperty('opacity', '0', 'important'); clearTimeout(timer); timer = setTimeout(function () { c.style.removeProperty('opacity'); }, 400); }).observe(c, { attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'], subtree: true, childList: true }); } var found = document.getElementById(ID); if (found) { watch(found); return; } if (!document.body || !('MutationObserver' in win)) return; var mo = new MutationObserver(function () { var c = document.getElementById(ID); if (c) { mo.disconnect(); watch(c); } }); mo.observe(document.body, { childList: true }); setTimeout(function () { mo.disconnect(); }, 30000); } function loadWidget() { var api = win.HubSpotConversations; if (api && api.widget && api.widget.status && api.widget.status().loaded) return; try { cloakChatResizes(); } catch (e) {} if (api && api.widget) api.widget.load(); } function onFirstInteraction() { if (done) return; done = true; EVENTS.forEach(function (type) { win.removeEventListener(type, onFirstInteraction, { passive: true }); }); var start = function () { if (win.HubSpotConversations) loadWidget(); else (win.hsConversationsOnReady = win.hsConversationsOnReady || []).push(loadWidget); }; if ('requestIdleCallback' in win) win.requestIdleCallback(start, { timeout: 1500 }); else setTimeout(start, 200); } EVENTS.forEach(function (type) { win.addEventListener(type, onFirstInteraction, { passive: true }); }); })(window);

91探花

Skip to main content
AI can accelerate optimisation, but it cannot replace biological discovery

22.10.2026 | Published by 91探花

AI can accelerate optimisation, but it cannot replace biological discovery

AI can accelerate optimisation, but it cannot replace biological discovery

91探花 featured in Drug Discovery & Development, Pharma Press

In a new feature for Life Science Daily, 91探花 CEO Dr Emma Pepperell addresses the limits of artificial intelligence in drug discovery. While machine learning excels at high-throughput pattern recognition and process optimisation, Dr Pepperell emphasises that AI cannot compensate for an underlying deficit in mechanistic understanding or infer novel biological mechanisms without wet-lab experimental data.

Because machine learning algorithms remain strictly bound to the quality and validity of their input data, training them on traditional animal models merely reproduces species-specific biases and limitations. To truly reduce late-stage clinical attrition, the industry must commit equally to generating dense, reproducible, human-relevant datasets, such as those produced using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), to ground computational models in human biological reality.

"The true ceiling of AI-driven drug discovery will not be determined by computational scale alone, but by our capacity to generate the dense, high-fidelity, and human-relevant biological datasets required to ground these models in clinical reality."


Emma Pepperell CEO, 91探花

Related pages

About us Coding cells to advance the wellbeing of humanity
Careers See the latest openings
Blog See the latest blogs